KTN's online platform helps you to make the connections you need


The Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN) has refreshed its online platform to intelligently connect you to relevant events, funding, thought pieces and specialist staff to help your business innovate and grow.

You can discover content using your area of interest, from ICT to transport; from space to health – all major UK economic sectors are covered. Once you have selected your interests, using our intelligent tagging system, we will then display rich and relevant content related to your area, often from surprising sources.

An example might be new satellite technology from the space sector that is applicable in the agri-food sector. KTN-UK.co.uk will help you form these unusual and valuable connections.

All content on the platform has been carefully curated by our team of innovation specialists – not by an automated algorithm – so you can be confident that KTN is connecting you to the most relevant cutting-edge information.


The move also marks a closer alignment with our main funder, Innovate UK , with the website branding making a clear visual link. Knowledge Transfer Network is Innovate UK's innovation network partner, and also works with other funders to provide innovation networking services and fulfil our mission to drive UK growth.

We link new ideas and opportunities with expertise, markets and finance through our network of businesses, universities, funders and investors. From agri-food to autonomous systems and from energy to design, KTN combines expertise in all sectors with the ability to cross boundaries. Connecting with KTN can lead to potential partners, horizon-expanding events and innovation insights relevant to your needs.

Visit our people pages to connect directly with expertise in your sector.

Visit the KTN refreshed online platfom here


« go back

How far are we from a unifying standard for the Internet of Things?

Last week, seven major telecom operators formed an alliance to create a common M2M management platform.  It’s not exactly a  standard, as all seven providers  — KPN, NTT DoCoMo (DCM), Rogers, SingTel, Telefónica (TEF), Telstra, and Vimpelcom (VIP) — use the same M2M management platform supplied by Jasper Wireless, but it’s a start, and paves the way to interoperability among a large section of the world’s carriers.  

However, these carriers current customer base is tiny, compared to what will happen when things begin to communicate with each other, or so we have been led to believe. Devices will be connected by technologies from Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and ZigBee to a range of 2G and mobile broadband networks. So just how easy will it be to ensure that a device can connect to a particular network at a specified time? The answer, presently, is not very. 

The European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), the Telecommunications Industry Assn. (TIA), and the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) in the U.S. are working on the problem, together with their counterparts in Japan, Korea, and China.

The issue of fragmentation among bands and technologies won’t be going away anytime soon but what these global bodies are attempting to develop is a common “service layer” that can be embedded in every M2M device, making it compatible with M2M application servers hosted by any global operator. This requires a business arrangement with each carrier and also a common protocol.

An alliance, such as the one formed last week, can have multiple benefits. It could, for instance, solve Amazons’ predicament with the Kindle. At present,  the Kindle only has one home network, AT&T, which means that if a user is in a country not served by the company, download fees would apply. However, if AT&T were to join the alliance (it’s also a Jasper Wireless customer), download charges could be waived. 

Ad-hoc standards currently seem more feasible than a common one but if the industry bodies can negotiate a way for M2M devices to be device carrier and network agnostic, there’s the lucrative prospect of a massive acceleration in the development of things untethered to a specific carrier, platform or server. The alternative is  many internets, each with its own separate sets of things and associated complexities for users. Not an ideal standard. 



3 people have had something to say so far

There is a real tendency to misuse the term M2M, when really one means machine-to-network. Cellular is not the answer for M2M although it has a role in machine-to-network. Machine-to-machine (M2M) requires a different approach and one that surely a single standard will never fulfil - its applications and uses are far too diverse.
Posted on 23/07/12 09:33.
anonymous anonymous
I agree with David. I can't see M2M ever relying on a single standard. Different machines will require connections at different distances at different polling intervals. One standard will not work for the extreme range of connected devices.
Posted on 23/07/12 09:56 in reply to David Bartlett.
There is always a compromise with one-size-fits-all 'standard', in my world, very low power is a critical requirement. However, the idea of a configurable service layer for network interface to provide the optimal connection relaibility and data security would be great.
I am less concerned about the network access protocol, I'm more concerned about semantics of the data which is transferred. Without such industry-driven sematics non-proprietary end-to-end M2M is a long way off.
Posted on 23/07/12 12:40.

Most read articles

Horizon 2020: the next steps

Horizon 2020, the EU’s funding program for research and innovation for the next six years,...

HPC in H2020

The KTN was pleased to support the National Contact Point for ICT with a recent event on the...

Wayra launches new call for digital startups

Wayra, Telefonica’s innovation accelerator, has announced a new call to find digital...