KTN's online platform helps you to make the connections you need


The Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN) has refreshed its online platform to intelligently connect you to relevant events, funding, thought pieces and specialist staff to help your business innovate and grow.

You can discover content using your area of interest, from ICT to transport; from space to health – all major UK economic sectors are covered. Once you have selected your interests, using our intelligent tagging system, we will then display rich and relevant content related to your area, often from surprising sources.

An example might be new satellite technology from the space sector that is applicable in the agri-food sector. KTN-UK.co.uk will help you form these unusual and valuable connections.

All content on the platform has been carefully curated by our team of innovation specialists – not by an automated algorithm – so you can be confident that KTN is connecting you to the most relevant cutting-edge information.


The move also marks a closer alignment with our main funder, Innovate UK , with the website branding making a clear visual link. Knowledge Transfer Network is Innovate UK's innovation network partner, and also works with other funders to provide innovation networking services and fulfil our mission to drive UK growth.

We link new ideas and opportunities with expertise, markets and finance through our network of businesses, universities, funders and investors. From agri-food to autonomous systems and from energy to design, KTN combines expertise in all sectors with the ability to cross boundaries. Connecting with KTN can lead to potential partners, horizon-expanding events and innovation insights relevant to your needs.

Visit our people pages to connect directly with expertise in your sector.

Visit the KTN refreshed online platfom here


« go back

Is the UK good enough at commercialising innovation?

Last week’s FT (Financial Times) examined a contentious topic: that the UK is not very good at commercialising the innovations that its universities and startups create. 
A comment from Hanadi Jabado, who directs a start-up accelerator at Cambridge university’s Judge Business School, sums up the issue under debate: 
“The UK leads the world in terms of research but if you look at the commercialisation of innovation, the UK lags behind. What we seem to be doing is to develop a concept and then sell it to international companies to optimise. We’re preparing the lunch, we’re cooking the lunch, but someone else is eating the lunch.”
Some article highlights:
  • The UK is accused of not capitalising on major discoveries by companies that went on to global success elsewhere and UK breakthroughs in chemistry, computer science and the internet that ultimately benefited German and US firms. Its innovators are said to  lack “entrepreneurial DNA;” they’re not trained to commercialise research. 
  • A recent PA Consulting survey estimates that UK companies are wasting £65bn a year on unsuccessful innovation. The UK came seventh on a list of 14 countries ranked by success in innovation, behind Mexico, Sweden, the US, Norway, Germany and Denmark.
  • Graphene - Since its discovery in a Manchester University physics lab in 2004, more than 11,000 graphene-related patents and patent applications have been filed globally. The UK has accounted for fewer than 1 per cent of these. 
  • Disagreement “on the relative merits of the different mechanisms through which the government attempts to support innovation. These include grants from Innovate UK, incentives such as the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme to encourage start-up investment, and the more recent Catapult centres.” But experts do agree that the tightening of immigration restrictions is harmful for entrepreneurs. 
  • Michael Kitson, a lecturer in macroeconomics at Cambridge university counters the argument that the UK is bad at innovation: “You need to have a richer and more varied set of metrics,” he says. “We tend to look at innovation in terms of the creation of new products; we don’t look at new processes and, most crucially, we don’t think about the diffusion of innovation — it is the diffusion effect that has the biggest impact on economic growth. Innovation is often messy and people-based.”
  • The FT also spoke to former Science Minister, David Willetts, now  executive chair of the Resolution Foundation, who says: “A lot of innovation happens in service industries because of the structure of our economy. So a legal firm that provides a new sort of advice for financial services is innovation. But because it’s not R&D-intensive in the conventional manner, it’s quite hard to pick up in the data.”
Are we doing enough? Are traditional methods of evaluating the commercialisation of innovation no longer valid? And what more could be done? If you have access, take a look at the FT article and let us know what you think. 
image: Boegh/flickr


1 person has had something to say so far

Michael Kitson says above "Innovation is often messy and people-based."

In my experience it's always messy and driven, or not, by people.

A lack of ambition seems to me to be the main problem in the UK. A perhaps a lack of acceptance of the uncertainty that comes with that.
Posted on 21/08/15 10:13.

Most read articles

Horizon 2020: the next steps

Horizon 2020, the EU’s funding program for research and innovation for the next six years,...

HPC in H2020

The KTN was pleased to support the National Contact Point for ICT with a recent event on the...

Wayra launches new call for digital startups

Wayra, Telefonica’s innovation accelerator, has announced a new call to find digital...